New Paper reveals AG “Local weather” swimsuit as an unlawful product of personal lobbying, misrepresentation, paid “clippings” – what to do with it?
Reposted by state accountability and oversight
WEBEDITOR GAO
Today the law firm Government Accountability & Oversight (PC) published a paper on behalf of its client entitled “Private Funders, Public Institutions: Climate Disputes and a Crisis of Integrity”.
Minnesota’s “climate” indictment and its replica filed the next day in Washington, DC, like all those lawsuits, represent transparent attempts to establish state jurisdiction over what its proponents previously admitted is national, before federal courts and seeks to replace Congressional refusal to adopt the desired political agenda with judgments.
The paper reveals for the first time damn details confirming who is actually running this supposedly state litigation campaign and how they are doing it, as described in the parties’ own hands.
This paper and yesterday’s Supreme Court opinion in BP plc et al. v The Baltimore Mayor and Councilor, as a bookend, recalled the importance of this jurisdiction in the wave of “climate” disputes that are flooding state courthouses across the country and the inappropriateness of their trial in local courts.
Read the paper here.
Like this:
Loading…
Comments are closed.