Trump signed the 2019 bipartisan Entrepreneurship and Women’s Economic Empowerment Act of 2019. To put the family signature on the grand initiative of Ivanka and his family to introduce $ 265 million a year to be spent on Micro, small and medium– great corporate support, was called that Global Development and Prosperity Initiative for Women (W-BIP).
Ivanka’s claim was that using the W-GDP the The US Agency for International Development (USAID) and nine other US agencies are to “codify gender analysis and provide targeted funding for all women’s programs” in these agencies. Important, conservative, republican, Ivanka told the world that this program would allow us to “closely track the execution and effectiveness of the money we are spending,” and most importantly, like a superficial infomercial, Ivanka explained that this was great A smart idea would be: “The first nationwide approach to unlocking the undeniably underutilized resource in the developing world: the power, potential, strength and genius of women in the world.”
Here she says that.
Sounds good. It is strange that your father cut down some of the programs that worked to do just that, but I am sure we will provide “targeted funding” and “rigorously” monitor the “execution and effectiveness of the money we have.” give out, ”it will be easy to see how the Trump administration was able to unleash things.
Here are some of the findings from the GAO:
USAID has not developed a process to support observance legally Target requirements MSME resources for activities that achieve the Vvery poor and too small and medium-big Company resources for activities that achieve Company owned, managed and controlled by Women. We identified three keys Loopholes affecting USAID’s ability to develop such a process. First, USAID has not identified the total funding that is subject to the targeting requirements. Second, Although USAID has programs designed to help the poor, it cannot Determine the amount of funding this group will achieve. Third, even though USAID has MSME activities that benefit women, it has not defined any company owned, is administered and controlled by women and does not collect data by company size. These loopholes leave USAID unable to determine What Percentage of its MSMEs Resources go to the very poor and owned, managed and owned by companies controlled by women.
“A senior Trump administration official who worked on W-GDP, “Politico said that before the Trump administration everything was a mess and no one knew where the money for programs was going. Again, the GAO:
USAID collected and reported incomplete and inconsistent data in its process for Monitoring of MSME support. USAID surveys its missions and offices yearly collect data on the amounts and results of MSME support. However, YOU SAID collected and reported incomplete data on its MSME support in tax matters Year 2019, the year of the last report. The survey was not sent to everyone relevant missions and officesand less than half of it receive the survey answered. In addition, USAID reports support in fiscal year 2019 that reached the very poor included activities of only three of 21 missions that replied to his poll. USAID guidelines state that its data should be clear and precise adequately represent the intended result. Without complete and consistent data, USAID cannot ensure that accurate information is reported to Congress about its MSME support.
Florida Democratic MP Lois Frankel, who co-drafted the WEEE Act, told Politico that the good news is that GAO reporting is a requirement of the bill and hopefully Congress will respond to this information and provide more meaningful scrutiny in the future could be more than what has been clearly offered in recent years.
In the end, Ivanka’s job, like everyone else in the Trump administration, was to tell Americans, and the world, that her father wasn’t a terrible person. Ivanka’s particular field of propaganda was to say that the Donald wasn’t a terrible person to women, although all evidence indicated he was a misogynist bastard. Ivanka proclaimed far and wide that her father was committed to women’s issues, but was only successful as long as there were no other people in the room who asked her questions that were not written to her. Just like the ill-conceived family vacation plan Ivanka worked on with Marco Rubio from Florida, it was a shiny object filled with endemic problems that plague the corrupt and myopic among us.
Comments are closed.